Review: The School for Good and Evil (Netflix)

Back in June when I found out that Netflix was making a movie adaptation of The School for Good and Evil, I went ahead and read the first book in the series. I liked the idea of a school for fairy tale characters, but it left me with a lot of questions regarding how changing their childhoods would alter their stories and why the author had such a superficial perception of good, evil, and girls in general. The Netflix adaptation resolved many of these issues by cutting irrelevant scenes and dialogue and making just enough minor changes to the plot to make it more coherent. Was it a perfect movie? It was never going to be, considering the source material. The filmmakers did a great job of salvaging whatever substance they could find from the book and turning it into a fun teenage romp with gorgeous costumes.

The School for Good and Evil Netflix Poster

The School for Good and Evil is about two girls named Sophie and Agatha who live in a backwoods town called Gavaldon. Though the other people in the town are cruel to Agatha and mockingly call her a witch, she is happy as long as she has Sophie by her side. Sophie, on the other hand, wants more out of life. She dreams of becoming a princess and living a life of fairy tales and adventure. Where the book focuses mainly on Sophie and Agatha's differences and how unlikely they are to become friends, the movie does a fantastic job of portraying their deep bond with some stellar acting and dialogue that reminds us what it was like when our best friend was the most important person in our lives and nothing else mattered. Sophie and Agatha are there for each other through thick and thin, telling off bullies, sharing inside jokes, and bonding over their favorite things. I thought their friendship was much stronger in the Netflix film than it ever felt in the book.

Once we get to know our heroines, they are whisked away to the School for Good and Evil, where Sophie is forced to mingle with a bunch of goths and furries, while Agatha gets trapped in a nightmare of her own with a bunch of stuck-up princesses who are just as cruel to her as the children from her village. This is where the movie tries to redeem the inconsistencies of the book. In the book, Agatha was a confusing person who was obsessed with death, played cruel pranks, and tried to sabotage Sophie to get her to leave the school. Meanwhile, Sophie was obsessed with princesses and goodness but constantly went off the rails with little explanation until she ultimately killed someone with no repercussions. The movie made both of these characters more consistent and relatable. No longer carrying around dead animals, Agatha is a reluctant hero with all the potential in the world except self-confidence. Sophie's actions are also more consistent thanks to the film introducing the character of Rafal much earlier than the book. Instead of having Sophie act out for no reason, all of her wicked acts were prompted by Rafal's manipulation to revolutionize the school.

While I enjoyed the changes that were made and understood the reasoning behind them, I think that hardcore fans of the book series might be disappointed because so much was cut. The majority of the scenes that were cut for the Netflix adaptation involved magical transformations that enhanced the setting of a magic school but added little to the story. I could see that the majority of the film's budget went into the costumes, leaving little room for visual effects. The one aspect of the book that the film was lacking, as a result, was Agatha's proficiency in class. In the book, she quickly became an expert at magic and excelled in all her own classes at the School for Good while helping Sophie with her classwork in the School for Evil by disguising herself as a cockroach and whispering all the answers in her ear. Here, the only thing Agatha got graded on was smiling, which she immediately failed. One benefit of the lack of magical transformations is that the film excluded all of the gratuitous underage nudity that the author featured to a disturbing degree in the book.

The School for Good and Evil is a fun and harmless fantasy flick for young audiences. It removed all of the disturbing imagery and questionable moral decisions on behalf of the main characters that made me uncomfortable when I read the book. The Netflix adaptation is a simple and somewhat forgettable story that reminded me of many similar teen movies like Disney's Descendants. I loved the costumes, especially all of the gorgeous princess gowns featured throughout, though I was surprised that the movie acquired the rights to Tchaikovsky's "Sleeping Beauty Waltz" for a key makeovers scene after Disney refused to give the rights to the melody to a Barbie movie that never got made. If you're looking for a quick fantasy fix, this movie is a perfectly fine option, which, unlike the book, is safe to share with your kids.

Comments

Sugar said…
I'm not interested in the books because I've heard they have questionable things... but the movie sounds much better, although unfortunately I think it's far from being the next Harry Potter-style hit.
Honestly it's something I always wanted, as a child I grew up more with the Fairy Oak trilogy based on two twin witches (in a different style than brooms and wands) than with Harry Potter, I wanted female protagonists! I have always wanted someone to write a long series where readers can grow with their protagonists but that is focused on princesses, fairies, etc... something as if a protagonist like Sophia the first went to an academy and we could see her grow in each book and fall in love defeating evil mostly without violence. I guess my idea is several decades late...I should try Shannon Hale's Princess Academy I've heard it has romance.
Lisa Dawn said…
I have a review of Princess Academy on my blog. I thought it was all right, but there wasn't as much fairy tale content as I was expecting. It's mostly about the importance of education and community.
Jasmine said…
The premise reminds me of Ever After High with the main characters are the children on Fairytales deciding if they are Royal or Rebel. The main leaders of those groups are Apple White (the daughter of Snow White) and Raven Queen (daughter of the Evil Queen from Snow White).
Lady Culturina said…
Sure, there was many material adapted out (the gargoyles, the fact that wolves and fairies were expelled students, Mrs Dovey who was the Fairy Godmother, the circus of talents, Princess Uma, the Beast...) Sometimes it was for the best (the iron hot shoes). But I regret some decors (the gingerbread room, notably), or the picnics setting for lunch (it was too cold in winter, maybe?). While we're at it, the book had food porn (seriously, the picnics description were so yummy, I reproduced some). The film had none, but relay on costume porn instead. The uniforms in the book would probably look too plain, and the dresses that the Good girls wear instead are gorgeous. If the book was adapted, I wondered if Gavaldon would be modern day settings instead. Turn out not, despite the lunch scene seemed straight from a present day high school. But my other assumption (Nobody but the book seller have heard of kidnappings, and it's a recent notion for Sophie) was correct. I'm pleased everything is more moral. Agatha act as a nice girl in Gavaldon already. Sophie (who's not popular anyway there) have an excuse to not like her stepmother, she is not just ugly, she's nasty. Plus she's a genuine friend to Agatha, not just to sound good. And the frying pan of doom, pure genius! Good was sure superficial, and it was supposed to be normal. Thankfully here, it's explained that Good was rendered vain by Rafal, that's why girls like Beatrix can be considered "good". And no, this time, Professor Anemone don't find all of this normal. Each book or so seemed the last, and you could feel the efforts of Soman Chainani to continue after a closed ending. The scenarists could fortunately clean the mess, introducing earlier some elements (Agatha waited until book two to kiss Tedros, and Rafal's first name was not revealed until book three). The left out parts are for the best, because sometimes it made the story confusing. Like merging Lady Lesso with Evelyn Sader: I even forgot the second one existed.^^;
Cupcakedoll said…
I loved the sets and costumes. Art nouveau architecture? Yes please! I liked that it made more sense than the book. I thought the final battle sequence was a transformations & magic battle like Fate should have had. See Netflix, you CAN do it!

Also I liked the weird bald person in the Evil school. I don't know who she or maybe he is, but she or he is awesome and should get to be weird and bald in many more things.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: The Spanish Princess/White Queen Trilogy

One Hundred Princesses for My 100th Post

Review: Disney Princess - The Concert

Review: Time Princess - The Apothecary

Princess Fashion

Review: Time Princess - Sisters of the Sea

The Nutcracker Prince Is the Best Nutcracker Movie You've Never Seen!

Review: The Alice Cocktail Experience

Dyesebel Is the Best Mermaid Princess Show You've Never Seen

The Burning Question: Is Mulan a Princess?